RedHat, Fedora future?

[M.Hockings]

Bryan Encina wrote:

>>Personally I find this all very interesting as before reading this
>>thread I didn't even know that there was a spec about where to put
>>things!  Here are a few randomish thoughts.
>>
>>On Windows you will see the  typical installer ask to put a new program
>>at "C:\Program Files\some-vendor-name" but you can change this to
>>"e:\where-ever-ya-want" and the program will still install.  However it
>>now won't match the documentation -- does this confuse users too?  (ans:
>>yes, even though they chose to put it there)
>>    
>>
>
>I don't claim to be an expert on this (or anything at all), but isn't the
>reason that Windows can get away with doing this and still having
>plugins/addons install correctly because of the registry, one central place
>where system wide settings can be looked up?  AFAIK there isn't anything
>like that in linux (not saying there should be, either) so that's possibly
>why installing into non-standard places can make installing/upgrading addons
>a little harder.
>

Yes, this is true, but I have also had to help resolve problems with 
customers where the registry was corrupt or out of sync due to system 
failure, user editing,  deletion of files without uninstall, etc.  
Thousands of entries if you use an msi installer.   There is a lot to be 
said for a *simple* ordered way of putting things in the file system 
(IMHO).  That is, I would presume that if a vendor supplies an RPM 
install then the same vendor should know how to update or remove the 
install as well.

Mike