Linus Virus Scanner
Lorenzo Prince
lorenzo at prince.homelinux.org
Sun Feb 8 03:42:05 UTC 2004
The famous speaker who no one had heard of said:
> Sorry, I am new to this mailing list.
<rant>
Please, Please people, trim your quotes. The following was way too long for an
8-word responce as shown above. Nothing bothers me more than to have to read 3
entire messages above someone's 1-line reply. I very nearly gave up on this one,
but read on just so I could post this rant. I know this has been said many times
before, but I feel it necessary to repeat in this situation, as this is actually
the second message in a row on this thread that could have used a post like this
one.
</rant>
PRINCE
> M.Hockings wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:58, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> >
> >>>Am Sa, den 07.02.2004 schrieb Chris um 22:52:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Can any one recommend a good one?
> >>>>
> >>>>it has to be able to detect windows viruses as well
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Chris.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Why don't you search this list's archive?
> >>>
> >>>clamav is ok, f-prot is free for private use too, uvscan by McAfee/NAI
> >>>works good too.
> >>>
> >>>Alexander
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
> >>>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel
> >>>2.4.22-1.2149.nptl
> >>>Sirendipity 22:57:19 up 7 days, 21:57, load average: 0.50, 0.30,
> >>>0.19 [ ?????????? ??'?????????? - gnothi seauton ]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Brian Connolly wrote:
> >>>
> >>>"Why don't you search this list's archive?"
> >>>
> >>>Alexander,
> >>>
> >>>Will you please stop your bitching. It's getting really annoying. I
> >>>recommend you either help people or don't. Enough with the
> >>>grade-school
> >>>reprimands for various infractions of "the rules". I've never followed
> >>>them; not about to start now. So stop already.
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Brian Connolly
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Hmmm, Seems to me that Alexander did both. That is, he pointed out a
> >number of virus scanners that run on Linux and indicated that more
> >information could be obtained by searching the archives. AV scanners
> >for Linux have been discussed through several threads and Chris could
> >obtain more information from them than a long regurgitation from
> >Alexander (or others).
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040207/c46b490d/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list