galeon?

[Jason Dixon]

On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:46, Brian Johnson wrote:

> No idea why they chose ephinany or firebird or mozilla, but running firebird,
> ephinany and galeon on the same url showed only a 2MB difference in the memory
> they used (the lowest was epiphany at 18MB).
> 
> IM, that extra 2MB is justified by galeon with it's numerous additional
> features.

Not to continue picking on Mozilla|Firebird|Epiphany, but Galeon's
session handling is just _so_ much better.  I've tried the various Moz
extensions.  They either a) don't work, b) don't work well, or c)
conflict with other tab extensions.

Galeon just works.

-- 
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net