RH now exiting 1 more data center

[Joe Klemmer]

On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 09:17, T. Ribbrock wrote:

> > 	FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could
> > be.  And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days
> > as well.
> 
> Huh? 4.2, 5.2 and 6.2 were excellent releases wrt stability - that's
> exactly where the old "only use the x.2s from RH!" addage came from. 7.2
> was an exception but was improved on by 7.3 (which fits nicely into the
> row above).

	Lord!  That's exactly my point.  The older releases needed to get to
x.2 before they were stable while FC1 is almost there now.  I expect FC2
to be even better.  Next time read before you reply.

-- 
Kuramarujo - http://www.webtrek.com/~klemmerj/sumo.html