RH now exiting 1 more data center

Res res at ausics.net
Wed Feb 25 22:19:11 UTC 2004


On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 16:33, Res wrote:
>
> > > 	FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was.  The only disadvantage to
> > > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle.  It will cost a lot more in
> >
> > what rubbish, see my original post.
>
> 	I did.  You are not correct on this but it seems that you are firmly
> entrenched in your beliefs that no amount of logic or proof would change
> your mind.

Really... proof ? I see all the proof I need every day right here.
I wouldnt put fedora on a mail server doing 10 msgs a second leta lone 100
which RH9 handles without effort, as does the slackware boxes :)





More information about the fedora-list mailing list