FC1 as a server but NOT HP Proliant

[yavorsky gaetan]

Hi,
It's working but ...
If it's a critical production environment, and if you plan to contract 
support whith HP, forget it !
I do have a problem with a G3 server which crash after 2 weeks in 
production mode.
Since I have an other G3 as office server which run perfectly, I'm quite 
sure that it's a hardware problem, and I have standard 3 years garanty 
from HP.
So I called them, and I have been told that they don't care about my 
problem because of FC1 !!!!!!!!
They just told me to install RH8 which is the last "open" release 
supported, or to by RedHat ES3 !.
Not really what I expected from such a company ! ( why do not install 
WFW3.11 ??? )

If somebody has an other feed back HP, please let me know !
Regards.
Gaetan Yavorsky.


Michael Gargiullo a écrit :

>On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 08:25, Fredrik Holmberg wrote:
>  
>
>>What are your experiences on running Fedora (Core 1) as a server, in 
>>comparison to the former Red Hat 9 (Shrike)?
>>
>>--
>>Regards,
>>Fredrik Holmberg
>>
>>    
>>
>
>We actually use it in several dozen servers without incident.  We maybe
>the exception though.  We also run the SMP kernel without a problem.  We
>have it running on dual AMD systems, Dual Intel, and Dual Intel Xeon
>boxes.  We did have one boot problem on the dual xeon box, but we have
>it running on one of the mail gateways, and it handles everything
>nicely.
>
>
>  
>