Top or bottom.... matters less than some think.

[Andy Wallace]

On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 00:14, Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
> * Andy Wallace <linxit at ntlworld.com> [13-Jan-2004 00:01]:
> > A lot of people do - it's called Outlook. It doesn't understand
threads,
> > and doesn't set the In-Reply-To header, so in Threaded Message List
view
> > in Evolution, every Outlook user replying breaks the thread. That
really
> > bugs me, anyone know of a workaround?
> 
> I cannot help you with Evolution, but if you were using Mutt
> ( http://www.mutt.org ), then you could use "set nostrict_threads" in
> your config.  This setting would cause Mutt to try to match subjects
> also.  That feature saves the day for me. :)
> 

Is it very successful in that? Some threads here have dozens of replies,
rarely in sequence. How would it know where to put the Outlook replies?

Although at least they'd all be in the same 'chunk' so it is an
improvement nevertheless.

Cheers,

-- 
Andy