FC1 on the enterprise?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 18:14, Andre Costa wrote:
> You got a point; indeed, I didn't feel any safer after reading your
> message... ={ I didn't fully understand the relationship between RH and
> WBEL, TL etc. was based on 'generosity'. Better rethink the whole thing.

However, the info on WBEL is good info that is surely not to waste (I
won't), even if I don't plan on using WBEL.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040116/f0522f0f/attachment-0001.sig>