Adding Windows 2000 into a dual-boot after the fact?

[John V. Pope]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:23:32PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > > > Since it's unlikely you will be installing .NET on a non-XP system the gymnastics
> > > > of mapping the drives shouln't be needed.  I currently run a dual boot system with
> > > > WindowsXP running on the secondary drive.  Works fine.
> > > > 
> > > > John V. Pope
> > > 
> > > Why do you say that? Win2k runs it fine, right? I'd prefer 2K, personally.
> > 
> > Win2K, WinXP, same-same as far as running from the secondary drive.
> > 
> > John V. Pope
> 
> Okay, that's what I thought. What did you mean about the "unlikely to be installing .NET on a non-XP system" part? As far as I understand it, .NET, ASP.NET, etc. installs just as well on Win2k as it does on XP. Thus Win2k would work fine.

By non-XP I meant Win95/98/Me (DOS boot types) that can't install .NET (AFAIK).

Sorry for the confusion.

John V. Pope