Is there anything cheaper than VMWare that runs Win2k?

[Ron Herardian]

I played with bochs on XP Pro and attempted to install Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3 but the installer doesn't seem to recognize the emulated hardware.

Ron





Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:22:55AM -0800, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > This talk about adding Win2k lately has me thinking. I really hate
> > dual-booting. Mostly because I hate leaving Linux since that's where my
> > mail/irc/mp3s, etc. are. So I was wondering. Is there a virtualization
> > package out there (that works relatively well) that's cheaper than
> > VMWare and still runs Win2k. I ask that because I'm trying to get a
> > platform to run ASP.NET on (I'm using Mono currently, but it has issues)
> > and as far as I know I need at least Win2k for that. Last time I checked
> > Win4Lin only supported up to Windows ME. What else is there that works?
> >
> > Preston
> 
> There is "bochs" which runs nearly anything. Slow, but nearly anything.
> 
> http://bochs.sourceforge.net
> 
> --
> Gregory G. "Wolfe" Woodbury      `-_-'    Owner/Admin: wolves.durham.nc.us
> ggw at wolves.durham.nc.us         U     RHCT August 2003
> "The Line Eater is a boojum snark."     Hug your wolf.
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 

Global System Services Corporation (GSS)
650 Castro Street, Suite 120, Number 268, Mountain View, CA 94041, USA
+1 (650) 965-8669 phone, +1 (650) 965-8679 fax, +1 (650) 283-5241 mobile
rherardi at gssnet.com, http://www.gssnet.com

"The best way to predict your future is to create it." - Stephen Covey