production server

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 16:50, WipeOut wrote:
> My concerns with Fedora..
> 1) Redhat being in control of FC's destiny may force it down the path of 
> becoming a home user desktop more than a server platform because they 
> want people to buy RHEL which IMO is just way to expensive and we just 
> could not afford it.. The RHEL WS is more expensive then Windows XP so I 
> am not sure what they are going for there..

The value is relative, if you buy all proprietary software to do the
equivalent of what you can with RHEL WS then it would be far more
expensive.

However, if you mostly use GNU/Linux for things an almost basic server
installation can do, then it starts to become quite expensive.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040130/45449a3a/attachment-0001.sig>