Solid and Fedora?

[Casper Pedersen]

Hi Mauri,

I would not recomend to use Fedora - Fedora is a kind of development
distribution. You cannot expect to get fixes/updates after FC2 gets
released. There are people who will continue to bring out packages for
FC1 after FC2 is released.

If you don't want to pay RH for a disto - you should have a look at
whiteboxlinux (http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/) which is based on RH ES3,
and you can expect to get update for a few years in the future.

I have to say that I think that Fedora is a cool disto.

Regards/Casper

On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 09:01, Mauri Sahlberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A company I work for is process for acquiring a dedicated server for
> Solid database. Currently our users are complaining that applications
> are too slow a
> nd the application vendor has proposed to us that we get
> dedicated server for the database. For one reason or another vendor
> recommends that we should buy a Windows server for the Solid as it is
> faster than any unix server they know with Solid. 
> 
> I find this very hard to believe.
> 
> Any experiences on running Solid on two processor machine under Fedora
> or Redhat?
-- 
GPG Public key is available from: http://www.keyserver.net/
Fingerprint = 56ED 74A4 7B00 20E2 B493 0C1A 6B4E BF8F A086 FE57

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040104/c1bb7ded/attachment-0001.sig>