Bind v. TinyDNS
Christopher Chan
cchan at outblaze.com
Sun Jan 4 22:50:43 UTC 2004
>>>Every time there an update on one patch, those admins suffer real pains
>>>that could have been avoided if but Dan's arrogance allowed it.
>>
>>Arrogance? DJB has written a lot of great software and has allowed us to
>>use it and the source code free of charge. That's hardly arrogance. You
>>can disagree with the license he has chosen for the software that he wrote,
>>but to shun him for not doing it your way is unfair.
>
>> His Web site is clear about what is allowed and what isn't.
>
>
> Of course. You can't publish an improved qmail, even to your friends who
> don't know how to patch.
DJB likes to keep his signature on HIS piece of software. You got a
problem with that?
You are allowed to redistribute all the code in his software projects
with changes but under a different name. That's also in binary form.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list