Update patches versus full update RPM.

James Kosin jkosin at intcomgrp.com
Fri Jan 9 16:03:47 UTC 2004


Dear Rui Miguel Seabra,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lamar Owen" <lowen at pari.edu>
To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.


| On Friday 09 January 2004 10:24 am, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
| > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 15:20, Lamar Owen wrote:
| > > For those who don't follow fedora-devel, I would like to summarize
what I
| > > have found after making a proposal and requesting comments about a
| > > mechanism to reduce the amount of bandwidth that is wasted downloading
| > > updates.
|
| > You could summarize before having incited people to pester the
| > fedora-devel-list, right?

This is NOT pestering.  Often times developers can't see the tree through
the woods.  Every developer should love people making suggestions.  I do!
Sometimes it takes someone who uses the tools every day in a real world
environment to make a brillent suggestion that turns a so-so hum-hum product
into a real fire storm.

|
| That was the summary.  There has been backlash; demand needs to be
| established.  You want it, ask the developers.  What's wrong with that
| picture?

I'm in agreement with Lamar Owen on this issue.  But for really good ideas;
it should only take a demand of 1 person suggesting it!  Developers are
sometimes stubborn in this reflect... at least most of the one's I've come
accross.  I might be alone in my views of CHANGE IS GOOD phillosophy.


Thanks,
James Kosin

| -- 
| Lamar Owen
| Director of Information Technology
| Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
| 1 PARI Drive
| Rosman, NC  28772
| (828)862-5554
| www.pari.edu
|
|
| -- 
| fedora-list mailing list
| fedora-list at redhat.com
| To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list






More information about the fedora-list mailing list