Kpackage missing from Kdeadmin - Why, and howto rectify

Michael Kearey mutk at iprimus.com.au
Mon Jan 19 23:13:54 UTC 2004


Emiliano Brunetti wrote:
<snip>
> Would you tell me what modifications you had to make?
> 
> As i wrote in a previous post, i wasn't able to compile simply changing
> the spec file with a %define kpackage=1. I compiled from source, but
> kpackage later ran into several errors and it was pretty useless: it
> would open but wouldn't perform any real operation with rpms.
> 
> E.
> 
> 


I have put the hacked spec and a patch  on web site so you can easily 
see the changes:

http://home.iprimus.com.au/mutk/kdeadmin/kdeadmin.spec.patch
http://home.iprimus.com.au/mutk/kdeadmin/kdeadmin.spec

BTW, there are a few extra packages and deps needed to be able to 
build. I hope (assume ) that since you were able to build from source 
successfully, you should be able to build from src.rpm using the spec 
file.

Here is what I installed to get the build to succeed:
01/16/04 14:17:28 Installed: qt-devel 1:3.1.2-14.i386
01/16/04 14:19:07 Installed: XFree86-devel 4.3.0-42.i386
01/16/04 14:19:07 Dep Installed: pkgconfig 1:0.14.0-6.i386
01/16/04 14:19:07 Dep Installed: fontconfig-devel 2.2.1-6.1.i386
01/16/04 14:19:07 Dep Installed: freetype-devel 2.1.4-5.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Installed: kdelibs-devel 6:3.1.4-4.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Installed: libjpeg-devel 6b-29.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Installed: rpm-devel 4.2.1-0.30.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Installed: libpng-devel 2:1.2.2-17.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Installed: bzip2-devel 1.0.2-10.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Dep Installed: pcre-devel 4.4-1.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Dep Installed: arts 8:1.1.4-3.i386
01/16/04 14:22:33 Dep Installed: kdelibs 6:3.1.4-4.i386
01/16/04 14:31:34 Installed: gcc-c++ 3.3.2-1.i386
01/16/04 14:31:34 Dep Installed: libstdc++-devel 3.3.2-1.i386
01/16/04 14:37:05 Installed: arts-devel 8:1.1.4-3.i386
01/16/04 14:43:07 Installed: libart_lgpl-devel 2.3.16-1.i386


I do have to ask why such a need for kpackage? It is quite nice to 
look at, but it doesn't appear to do anything more than a small number 
of commandline + options could acheive.

ie 'yum list' 'yum list available' 'yum info <somepackage>' 'yum 
update' 'yum install <somepackage'>

I haven't tried keeping a fedora machine up to date using kpackage. In 
fact I don't know where to start. I do see that it has capability to 
use apt, so maybe it can do it that way ?

Cheers,
Michael





More information about the fedora-list mailing list