Spamass-milter vs Milter-Spamc
Ow Mun Heng
Ow.Mun.Heng at wdc.com
Fri Jul 2 00:45:51 UTC 2004
Guys,
I'm doing Spamass-Milter currently. Don't have much spam to train on
though. I only have like 18 spam mails.
Just wondering, which is the better alternative? I got spamass-milter
from dag's repo and seems like it's out of development vs Milter-Spamc
which is in active development.
(I don't want to go into procmail/MIMEDefang/mailscanner etc configs. I
at a time)
Spamass-milter seems to work OK except that I it doesn't really _yet_
know how to differentiate spam & Ham
This is what I have in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [N-SPAM]
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
bayes_path /var/run/.spamassassin
Note : I did not turn on additional stuffs. just the above. I'm hoping I
don't have to and get the Bayes filter to do it.
(but somehow autolearn is off in the headers)
$ ps awux | grep spam
root spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -f -r 15 -u defaultuser
spamd /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a -m5 -u spamd -x
Am I doing everything right here?
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list