okay to disable lvm? reduces boot delay from dvd drives
Jonathan Rawle
jr36 at leicester.ac.uk
Fri Jul 9 14:23:03 UTC 2004
Phil Dybvig wrote:
> it was hung and did a hard reboot). Setting up verbose logging for lvm
> yielded ``no volume groups found'' so i figured it wasn't doing anything
> and I disabled
> it by renaming /sbin/lvm.static to /sbin/lvm.static.bk. Then booting has
> been fast and the /dev/hda and /dev/hdb errors from the cd drives
> disappeared.
>
> All of this is good so far, but I want to ask to make sure that lvm isn't
> something I will need later and do not want to disable. Also, out of
> curiosity,
Logical volume management allows you to use multiple physical disks as if
they were a single disk. That can make partitioning and system
administration easier, but the downside is that if one disk fails, you can
lose a lot more data than you might have done without LVM. (It also leads
to problems upgrading, as you mentioned).
If you don't use LVM, you don't need it! However, renaming a binary file
can't be the right way to do it! rc.sysinit has a reference to /etc/lvmtab.
If you have this file and don't use LVM, you should delete it as that
determines whether LVM is set up.
Jonathan
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list