Spamass-milter vs Milter-Spamc

[Ow Mun Heng]

On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 18:26, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Fr, den 02.07.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 2:45:
> 
> > Spamass-milter seems to work OK except that I it doesn't really _yet_
> > know how to differentiate spam & Ham
> 
> Save at least 200 SPAM and 200 HAM mails and then run manually sa-learn
> to initialize the bayes database.

Great.. here's a complain you don't hear often. I _need_ more SPAM.

> 
> > This is what I have in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> > 
> > required_hits                   5
> > rewrite_subject                 1
> > subject_tag                     [N-SPAM]
> > report_safe                     0
> > use_bayes                       1
> > bayes_path                      /var/run/.spamassassin
> > (but somehow autolearn is off in the headers)

> Autolearning only happens up from specific SPAM values, which are
> defined in the default rule files. IIRC SPAM is only autolearned from 15
> points and above.

Great.. All my spams are less that that..