redhat tutorial

[jludwig]

On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 16:17, Nifty Hat Mitch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:23:20PM -0400, jludwig wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 18:32, Nifty Hat Mitch wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:01:47PM -0400, damon fister wrote:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sort of like 'info'.
> > > 
> > Please Please don't base it on emacs.
> 
> Info is not emacs.
> Some of the key strokes for the interface are emacs flavored.
> But your point is well taken.   Emacs and xemacs have  grown to the 
> point that it is too almost big.
> 
> A current markup language that can be viewed on multiple platforms
> (like html) is the way to go.  It would be good to permit a windowZ
> user to pop in a tutorial CDROM and do some homework and preperation.
> 
> Some interactive stuff could eventually be done in java or javascript.
> 
> I am a fan of the php documentation.  I very much like the facility
> for annotations that reviewers have.  Most of the php questions I have
> had have their answers in the annotations.  The "oh by the way" check
> this when you use this function stuff has been very helpfull.
> 
> The other choice is to join or host a WIKI that facilitates this
> project.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>    T o m   M i t c h e l l 
>    /dev/dull where most of what I type originates.
Very much agree. You should not need a tutorial to use a tutorial, and
very simple, intuitive, and easy to use.
-- 
jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>