FC2 v's FC1: memory handling
Satish Balay
balay at fastmail.fm
Wed Jun 2 02:02:58 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Marc Lucke wrote:
> Anecdotally it seems that FC2 will do everything it can to avoid paging to
> the hard disk whereas FC1 was quite happy to go on chewing up hard drive
> until the proverbial cows come home. However performance seems to suffer -
> my sendmail process now takes so long to answer when my hard disk is under
> heavy load and I am beginning to suspect that the system's paging routines
> might have something to do with this. In FC1, 1GB of RAM did not seem to be
> enough, in FC2 no matter what I'm doing it won't use any more than about
> 2-300k!
>
> I think this may be a kernel thing, but any comments?
Try:
echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
Checkout:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3000
Satish
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list