FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!

[Gregory Pittman]

Dan Thurman wrote:
> Craig,
> 
> I have read that and understood that paragraph and other explainations
> for the reason for the FC program.  I was pushing to get the (bleeding
> edge) problems fixed and that was why I started my original comment
> down that thread on the 'professionalism' of the upgrade process.
> I did not (intentionally) mean to 'open' the discussion in regards 
> to 'products' per se but to push to get the FC Gnome issue resolved.
> Other respondents noted it and gently 'informed' me to either get
> involved and file bug reports to the specific issues I had which
> was gracefully handled by them. (thanks)
> 
> But I guess you were offened.  I am sorry but I cannot help you.
> 
> Isn't this the place where the linux community gathers to discuss,
> gripe, complain, praise, contribute, otherwise have an OPEN DISCUSSION
> to the benefit of (FC) linux no matter how informed, uniformed, misinformed, 
> mature, or immature people might be?
> 
> Get a grip, please.
> 
> Best regards,
> ~ Dan
> 
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:38:00 -0700, Craig White wrote
> 
>>On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 07:51, Dan Thurman wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Jonathan,
>>>
>>>I would have expected that SOMEWHERE that GNOME or respective
>>>upgrades programs should have taken care of installation issues
>>>like this so that less geek people can continue their business
>>>without grief. Do we ALL have to become linux experts to fix things
>>>that otherwise could be taken care of?  I don't have TIME to read the
>>>RTFM's to get a CLUE where I should start when things go wrong.
>>>
>>>I would *expect* linux to be a *PROFESSIONALLY* built product...

<and so on>

Dan,

"Discussion" is one thing, but ranting and fuming is another.  Try to 
remember this isn't psychotherapy-list at redhat.com

Greg