Invalid GPG Signature Issue With New Kernel? (was: Re: Md5sum new kernel)
ajeffri at loopysite.org
Sat Jun 12 19:14:24 UTC 2004
On Fri, June 11, 2004 11:35, Alexander Dalloz said:
> Am Fr, den 11.06.2004 schrieb P. Ekholm um 18:25:
>> The output of kernel-2.6.6-1.427.i686.rpm md5sum is different from the
>> announcement md5sum. Have downloaded the files from different mirrors.
>> want to install the kernel if i´m not shure. Please correct this.
>> P. Ekholm
> Here does the md5sums from announcement differ with my own checks too.
> md5sums from announcement:
> db2fad6f1bc995fca31f1558aafe8d8a i386/kernel-2.6.6-1.427.i686.rpm
> md5sums self generated:
> 29dfd66fd621e25b7f4ba396b330c8ce kernel-2.6.6-1.427.i686.rpm
> $ rpm -K kernel-*
> kernel-2.6.6-1.427.i686.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
> kernel-sourcecode-2.6.6-1.427.noarch.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
> $ la kernel-*
> -rw------- 1 adalloz adalloz 14047835 11. Jun 17:24
> -rw------- 1 adalloz adalloz 45273157 11. Jun 17:37
I am having similar problems when running up2date, although here it's with
GPG signatures. I first encountered this on Friday, June 11 around 0100
CDT, and just got it again a few minutes ago:
"The package kernel-2.6.6-1.427 does not have a valid GPG signature.
It has been tampered with or corrupted. Continue?"
Anthony Jeffries | ajeffri at loopysite.org
People often find it easier to be a result of the past than a cause of the
future. -- Unknown
More information about the fedora-list