FC2 Issues

Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz at simpaticus.com
Thu Jun 17 14:52:17 UTC 2004

At 08:35 6/17/2004, Edward Croft wrote:
>I made
>the comment earlier, that this does indeed reflect on Red Hat. Not
>because they are responsible, but because they are associated. [...]
>Red Hat is to be
>commended. But they also need to be wary of any major issues with Fedora
>as the trade rags do associate Red Hat and Fedora and it will reflect on
>them. Just another angle to look at.

Oh, you are entirely correct. Red Hat does need to be careful that people 
don't see a bug in Fedora and jump straight to "Red Hat makes unstable 
software!" which some trade rags, some clueless pundits, and more than a 
few dumbass users will. Perception is a good part of reality.

I agree with you... I just vehemently disagree with those who claim that 
because FC is associated with and sponsored by RH, then it is by definition 
a *product* of RH and why can't we see that... I'm sure you know what I mean.


Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz at simpaticus.com

More information about the fedora-list mailing list