opinions on replacing vsftpd with proftpd?
Alexander Dalloz
alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Sun Jun 20 13:56:36 UTC 2004
Am So, den 20.06.2004 schrieb Robert P. J. Day um 15:32:
> ok, two votes for proftpd. that's a consensus, i guess. i just did a
> quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm. since it
> installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going to
> be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to
> test it yet. unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and
> version should be used on FC2.
>
> rday
I won't recommend using a release candidate (RC1). If you search for an
RPM I can recommend from own experience the package by freshrpms.net
http://tettnang.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=206
It is build for FC2 (Tettnang) and comes with a good and solid default
setup / proftpd.conf.
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435
Serendipity 15:54:54 up 21:42, 8 users, 0.55, 0.53, 0.50
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040620/74ebbc0a/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list