Bind Issues After FC2
edwarner99 at yahoo.com
edwarner99 at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 21 13:26:12 UTC 2004
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:08:22 +0200
> From: Bob Marcan <bob at interstudio.homeunix.net>
> Subject: Re: Bind Issues After FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <40D6C1A6.1050507 at interstudio.homeunix.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
>
> edwarner99 at yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >I did read the man pages, that's why I'm confused
> as
> >why it doesn't work now vs. FC1.
> >
> >I replaced the "/" in the directory directive to
> >"/var/named". Did that just as a test. But now I'm
> >still getting permission problems try to change to
> >that directory. I've set permissions to 777,
> ownership
> >to root and named.
> >
> >Like I said, I read the man pages, as well as a
> book I
> >have here, but I'm not getting anywhere fast.
> >
> >
> >
> Take a look at /etc/rc.d/init.d/named:
> ....
> start() {
> # Start daemons.
> if [ -n "`/sbin/pidof named`" ]; then
> echo -n $"$prog: already running"
> return 1
> fi
> echo -n $"Starting $prog: "
> if [ -n "${ROOTDIR}" -a "x${ROOTDIR}" != "x/" ];
> then
> OPTIONS="${OPTIONS} -t ${ROOTDIR}"
> fi
> daemon /usr/sbin/named -u named ${OPTIONS}
> ....
> Is named chrooted?
> Look at /etc/sysconfig/named.
>
> --
>
> Bob Marcan, Consultant
Bob,
I have never run this in chroot. Everything in
/etc/sysconfig/named is commented out.
I have not looked in /etc/rc.d/init.d/named. What
would I see if it was chroot'ed? What do I change to
get back to the original?
Did something change in FC2 to break this?
Thanks,
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list