Bind Issues After FC2

edwarner99 at yahoo.com edwarner99 at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 21 13:26:12 UTC 2004


> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:08:22 +0200
> From: Bob Marcan <bob at interstudio.homeunix.net>
> Subject: Re: Bind Issues After FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <40D6C1A6.1050507 at interstudio.homeunix.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> edwarner99 at yahoo.com wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >I did read the man pages, that's why I'm confused
> as
> >why it doesn't work now vs. FC1.
> >
> >I replaced the "/" in the directory directive to
> >"/var/named". Did that just as a test. But now I'm
> >still getting permission problems try to change to
> >that directory. I've set permissions to 777,
> ownership
> >to root and named.
> >
> >Like I said, I read the man pages, as well as a
> book I
> >have here, but I'm not getting anywhere fast.
> >
> >  
> >
> Take a look at   /etc/rc.d/init.d/named:
> ....
> start() {
>         # Start daemons.
>     if [ -n "`/sbin/pidof named`" ]; then
>         echo -n $"$prog: already running"
>         return 1
>     fi
>         echo -n $"Starting $prog: "
>     if [ -n "${ROOTDIR}" -a "x${ROOTDIR}" != "x/" ];
> then
>         OPTIONS="${OPTIONS} -t ${ROOTDIR}"
>     fi
>     daemon /usr/sbin/named -u named ${OPTIONS}
> ....
> Is named chrooted?
> Look at /etc/sysconfig/named.
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Bob Marcan, Consultant           

Bob,

I have never run this in chroot. Everything in
/etc/sysconfig/named is commented out.
I have not looked in /etc/rc.d/init.d/named. What
would I see if it was chroot'ed? What do I change to
get back to the original?

Did something change in FC2 to break this?
Thanks,


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 





More information about the fedora-list mailing list