FC2 doubtful quality?

[Patrick Boutilier]

Timothy Murphy wrote:
> David Jansen wrote:
> 
> 
>>On the other hand, FC2 works fine if you just take the time to read the
>>archives and search the internet for answers.
> 
> 
> This is a silly remark.
> All you can say is that "FC2 works fine" on the machines
> it is reported to work on.
> There are many unresolved bugs,
> eg Xorg does not work properly on machines with ATI Rage 128 video boards.
> 
> As far as I can see, 
> FC2 was released when there were known unresolved bugs in the test releases.
> In my view, it should have been delayed until these were fixed.
> It seems to have been released because a release date 
> had been fixed in advance.
> That is a silly way to organise distributions.
> I hope it will be changed.
> 
> 
>>It was never intended as a 
>>"plug & play" OS for the clueless and inexperienced

> 
> 
> It's amazing what idiotic excuses are made for software bugs.
> A bug is a bug - that's all there is to it.


Well then fix it. You have the source.




> 
>