FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel

Mike Fedyk mfedyk at matchmail.com
Mon Jun 28 22:57:35 UTC 2004


Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> 	Not sure if its Me, but FC2 seems slower to response compared to my old
> RH9 install. 

You're not the only one.  The most of the GUI oss projects have put more 
effort in adding features than memory conservation or speed tests.

Note that I said "more effort" not that there was none, or that it isn't 
a concern to many.





More information about the fedora-list mailing list