FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
Mike Fedyk
mfedyk at matchmail.com
Mon Jun 28 22:57:35 UTC 2004
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Not sure if its Me, but FC2 seems slower to response compared to my old
> RH9 install.
You're not the only one. The most of the GUI oss projects have put more
effort in adding features than memory conservation or speed tests.
Note that I said "more effort" not that there was none, or that it isn't
a concern to many.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list