[OT] Sender Authentication by list members (was) Fwd: Re: Weird process behavior
sandip at linux-delhi.org
Wed Jun 2 07:59:29 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Is it fair to subject members of a list to sender authenticated verifications?
Is this considered polite by list members?
- - Sandip
- ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Weird process behavior
Date: Wednesday 02 June 2004 1:09 pm
From: "yyyyy" <xxxxx at mail.spamrival.com>
You are receiving this message because of a message you sent to xxxxxxxx.
xxxxxxx is using a new anti-spam webbased service called SpamRival.com.
As such he/she only accepts email from authenticated users. This is to
insure that messages from automated spammers cannot get through.
In order for your message to be delivered, you will need to click the link
below. You will then be taken to a page that will display a graphic image.
Simply read the word in that image, type that word info the form and you
will be authenticated. You will only need to do this once.
SpamRival.com is a revolutionary new anti-spam webbased service that requires
senders to authenticate themselves before their email messages are delivered
to the recipient.
If you do not authenticate yourself within six days after receiving this
email message, your email messages will be deleted and therefore will not be
delivered to xxxxx.
sandip (at) puroga.com
Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Work: http://www.puroga.com Home: http://www.sandipb.net
GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-list