Filesystem corruption, data loss on usb drives, and more problems with FC2
Fernando Perez
Fernando.Perez at colorado.edu
Fri Jun 4 17:38:51 UTC 2004
James Wilkinson wrote:
> Fernando Perez wrote:
>
>>Clean, custom (over FTP) install of Fedora2 Final.
>>
>>System: Dell Optiplex GX-270 (Pentium 4, 2.8GHz, 120 GB Hard disk, 1 GB RAM,
>>NVidia GeForce 4MX video card, Dell 2000FP LCD, correctly identified and
>>working at 1600x1200 resolution). This machine was previously running
>>Fedora1, but a clean install (not an upgrade) was done.
>>
>><snip>
>>This system has Hyperthreading activated in the BIOS. Fedora installed both
>>an SMP and a UP kernel, I have done tests with both. All critical bugs
>>listed below have been reproduced with both kernels.
>>
>>I am running the stock kernels from the Fedora install, along with the Xorg
>>'nv' NVidia driver, which works ok (albeit with no 3d acceleration). So no
>>issues can be attributed to third-party kernel modules.
>>
>>Root filesystem corruption - CRITICAL, DATA LOSS
>>------------------------------------------------
>>
>>/ became 'read-only' after a very large build (rebuilding a large .src.rpm,
>>~ 3 hours of very cpu-intensive C++ compilation). I have never seen this
>>before. Obviously once the system thought that '/' was read-only, shit hit
>>the fan pretty quickly.
>
>
> I know you've said that this system ran FC1, but have you checked the
> memory on the system (try memtest86)?
This machine DID have hardware problems after a power outage a few weeks ago,
so just recently I ran pretty extensive hardware diagnostics. The memory
reported OK (I used Dell's memory testing CD so their tech support people
would acknowledge something, but I could retest with memtest86). The
motherboard and power supply were flaky, so those got replaced, and are brand new.
> One alternative is that your hard drive is dying. Although you gave lots
> of specs (thank you), you didn't mention the HD manufacturer. You may
> want to see if they have any diagnostic disks available (the IBM /
> Hitachi ones are good, for example).
The hard disk is also a brand new Seagate Barracuda (7200rpm) which I
purchased separately last week, because I needed more space. The box had a
40GB disk and this one is 120GB. So I guess it could have come faulty out of
the box...
> You probably don't want to invalidate your warranty, but trying to
> reproduce with a different hard disk and different memory would be
> interesting. It smells like dodgy hardware to me.
First I'll try to use one of Arjan's kernels and see what happens. I'm
definitely seeing usb-storage problems which are critical to me (we use
external USB flash disks, hard disks and DVD burners, so that's a
showstopper). Since many others are reporting USB problems as well, I'm sure
this one is not my hardware.
> For the record, yes, I see the DPMS problem too, although I haven't
> looked into it yet.
Another annoyance, hopefully someone will look into it. I'll file on bugzilla
later, since this one has been confirmed by several people already (on and
off-list).
Thanks,
f.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list