FC1 stable, FC2 ... you wish.
boutilpj at ednet.ns.ca
Mon Jun 7 01:53:35 UTC 2004
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Okay, so after a whole week of fighting FC2 to run, and having to
> reboot the machine every 4 to 5 hours because of a kernel panic, I
> downgraded to FC1 and low and behold...the server's running without a
> single hitch. So, something's screwed with FC2 which causes it to panic
> with either the pdflush or the swapper processes, whereas none of the
> previous RH versions, nor FC1 have that problem. It also trashed a 200
> GB drive every time it panicked. None of the previous versions of RH
> did that.
> And with everything else I have read on this list over the past two
> weeks or so, I'd say stay away from FC2. Maybe it's time I start
> looking at a different distribution...
Do as you please but I haven't had a single problem with FC2 .
More information about the fedora-list