[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

How to create a String Object in FD1?



Hi all,

Im trying to create a string object in C++.
This is what I type in:

#include <string>
#include <string.h>
#include <strings.h>

//im using a nearly all the header files I can think of

Class test
{
	public:
		string x;
		String y;
};

int main()
{
	test t1;
}


//errors string x defined as type but not declared as type
//errors String y defined as type but not declared as type

Are there any packages I can install to fix this problem???

Thanxs a million in advance
dave


-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of
fedora-list-request redhat com
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:36 AM
To: fedora-list redhat com
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 4, Issue 101


Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
	fedora-list redhat com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	fedora-list-request redhat com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	fedora-list-owner redhat com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: ntfs (eric tanguy)
   2. The RULE project is back (M. Fioretti)
   3. Re: Do we need /etc/modules.conf in FC2? (James Wilkinson)
   4. Re: cpuspeed usage (Nadeem Bitar)
   5. Unable to install FC2 on HP DL140 (soliday aps anl gov)
   6. Re: can't use my scanner as user (James Wilkinson)
   7. KPPP with Fedora Core 2 (Clyde Wilson)
   8. Re: KPPP with Fedora Core 2 (k b)
   9. re. Fedora Core 3 Wishlist (Paul deMeurisse)
  10. burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP (Mike Dixon)
  11. top CPU states (Jack Howarth)
  12. Re: top CPU states (Dave Jones)
  13. Re: burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP (bit)
  14. Re: Mounting Fat 32 (Windows) directory in FC2 (Gregory Pittman)
  15. Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist (Clif Smith)
  16. Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist (Dave Jones)
  17. Re: KPPP with Fedora Core 2 (Steven P. Ulrick)
  18. Re: Cisco wireless card not setup correctly when booting core
      2 (Clif Smith)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:28:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: "eric tanguy" <eric tanguy physique univ-nantes fr>
Subject: Re: ntfs
To: <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID:
	
<37204 82 126 77 247 1086557285 squirrel webmail sciences univ-nantes fr
>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Ok it works fine. Thanks but i found no specific section about ntfs in
man mount. It may due to the third party kernel install. Eric

> On Sunday 06 June 2004 05:16 pm, eric tanguy wrote:
>> Ok i installed the third party kernel module and now i can mount and 
>> read the ntfs partition. I had this line in /etc/fstab :
>> /dev/hda1		/mnt/winxp		ntfs	noauto,users,ro
0 0
>> but when i try to mount the partition as user i have this answer : 
>> you don't have the permission to see "winxp". What's the problem ??
>> Eric
>>
> Change that fstab line to:
> /dev/hda1		/mnt/winxp		ntfs
noauto,users,umask=022,ro 0 0
>
>
> That umask=022 should help you.  For more info, see the "Mount Options

> for NTFS" section  in the mount man page.
>

> Regards,
> Allen
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list






------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:49:19 +0200
From: "M. Fioretti" <mfioretti mclink it>
Subject: The RULE project is back
To: Fedora-List <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606214919 GG19036 mclink it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Greetings,

I'm happy to announce that the RULE project finally has a whole new
website, hopefully much more helpful and easier to both use and
update.

It still has a _lot_ of broken links (please be patient, signal them
to me off list), and no, we haven't updated the installer for FC2 yet,
but at least now it should be clearer what we are trying to do and
why.
Hopefully, the new infrastructure will also help us to make faster the
transition to FC2.

To know more, just visit: http://www.rule-project.org/

Thank you in advance for any feedback

Ciao,
	Marco Fioretti

-- 
Marco Fioretti                    mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Red Hat and Fedora for low memory       http://www.rule-project.org/

Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change
the world. it's the only thing that ever has.  (read on /.)




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 22:52:11 +0100
From: James Wilkinson <james westexe demon co uk>
Subject: Re: Do we need /etc/modules.conf in FC2?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606215211 GA2144 howells westexe demon co uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Richard E Miles wrote:
> It seems that FC2 uses /etc/modprobe.conf to start modules and not 
> /etc/modules.conf. Can we get rid of /etc/modules.conf?

Yes, you can get rid of it. A fresh install shouldn't have
modules.conf at all.

(That's if you're not planning to try to run 2.4 kernels.)

Of course, it's normally a good plan to rename files and run for a bit
to check that they really aren't needed. I like to use my initials for
this (e.g. modules.conf -> modules.conf.jpw): that way, I know that I
renamed the file manually, not some upgrade program.

HTH,

James.

-- 
E-mail address: james@ | "Never trust a species that grins all the time.
westexe.demon.co.uk    | It's up to something."
                       | (Terry Pratchett on dolphins)




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:53:40 -0700
From: Nadeem Bitar <nadiizu earthlink net>
Subject: Re: cpuspeed usage
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <1086558819 3144 0 camel kirika>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On æ?¥, 2004-06-06 at 12:36 -0400, Troy Campano wrote:
> Thank you Karsten.
> 
> Is there any way to check the status of the current CPU speed to make
> sure this change actually worked? 
> 

You can use the CPU frequency scaling monitor applet in gnome.
> 
> thank you!
> 
> On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 14:08, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 11:17:00AM -0400, Troy Campano wrote:
> > > Hello, 
> > > I am new to Fedora Core 2.
> > > 
> > > I'm trying to find out how to use the 'cpuspeed' tool.
> > > I've found examples on the web, but  they seem to be shell scripts
for
> > > tweaking acpi and no the daemon i see in fedora core 2.
> > > They haven't worked for me.
> > > 
> > > Basically, I'd like to know how to change my CPU speed to its
lowest
> > > speed (1.2 GHz) and highest speed (2.4GHz) and back and forth. Can
this
> > > be done with a command? In Fedora Core 1 I think I had to echo  to
> > > "/proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/performance" but I don't see this
anymore in
> > > Core 2.
> > > 
> > 
> > Try cpuspeed -h to get a short explanation of the commandline
parameters.
> > 'cpuspeed -d'   followed by   'killall -USR2 cpuspeed'    sets your
CPU to the
> > lowest supported clock speed, 'killall -USR1 cpuspeed' sets it back
to
> > normal speed.
> > 
> >     Karsten
> > 
> > --
> >  Karsten Hopp <karsten redhat de>   GPG 1024D/70ABD02C
> >  Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C
> >  Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58
> >  70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111
> > 
> >
______________________________________________________________________
> > -- 
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list redhat com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list




------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:54:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: soliday aps anl gov
Subject: Unable to install FC2 on HP DL140
To: fedora-list redhat com
Message-ID: <697936 1086558843130 JavaMail root telesto>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The Hewlett Packard proliant DL140 server does not have a floppy or a
cdrom drive. So I attempeted to install FC2 using the PXE network
install option.. I was able to connect to another server hosting the
installation files but after the selecting "English" and a "US" keyboard
it said I needed a network driver to continue. These machines use the
Broadcom tg3 driver which I selected but the installation did not
continue but instead just asked for another network driver. I then tried
to use a usb memory stick with the diskboot.img and a NFS install and it
stopped at the same point. Next I went out and bought a ucb cdrom drive
which I booted from. I selected to install from the local cdrom and it
asked for a driver to do this. I selected the usb mass storage driver to
no avail. I ended up installing Redhat 9. It was able to find the
ethernet controllers and the usb cdrom drive. I next copied the FC2 ISO
images to the hard drive and managed to install FC2 using these ISOs.
Unfor!
tunately it did not find my ethernet controllers.




------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:13:04 +0100
From: James Wilkinson <james westexe demon co uk>
Subject: Re: can't use my scanner as user
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606221304 GB2144 howells westexe demon co uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Eric Tanguy can only use his scanner as root.

He wrote:
> Yes it works like this. But i don't want to unplug and plug it back
when i
> want to use it. What's the problem and how solve it ?

Possibly the problem is the USB device node, /proc/bus/usb/$BUS/$DEVICE
only having write permissions for root.

If you do a sane-find-scanner, you'll get a line somewhat like this:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x05d8, product=0x4003, chip=GT-6816) at
libusb:001:002

The two last numbers are the interesting ones: in my case, $BUS is 001
and $DEVICE is 002. My scanner's device node is /proc/bus/usb/001/002,
which by default was owned by root with permissions of 644.

I solved this by creating a symlink from /dev/scanner to
/proc/bus/usb/001/002. Then when I login at the console,
/proc/bus/usb/001/002 is chowned to james and chmodded to 600. Now I can
scan as a normal user.

HTH,

James.

-- 
E-mail address: james@ | Banana in disk drive error
westexe.demon.co.uk    | 




------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:14:55 -0700
From: "Clyde Wilson" <clydew accessbee com>
Subject: KPPP with Fedora Core 2
To: <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <002901c44c13$b3413060$96aef242 default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I just installed Fedora Core 2 and I can't get kppp to work.  It
executes and connects...but then nothing.  I've been using kppp for a
long time.  Last week I used it with Core 1, so I suspect something has
changed.  Any help would be appreciated!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040606/920325ea/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: k b <k_b0000 yahoo se>
Subject: Re: KPPP with Fedora Core 2
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606222905 92967 qmail web12009 mail yahoo com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Clyde Wilson <clydew accessbee com> wrote:
> I just installed Fedora Core 2 and I can't get kppp
> to work.  It executes and connects...but then
> nothing.  I've been using kppp for a long time. 
> Last week I used it with Core 1, so I suspect
> something has changed.  Any help would be
> appreciated!
> > -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 

hard to tell what happens from the info you give.
however, if it connects and you get an IP-address
assigned i guess it does not change the default route
(it does not on my machine).
after you have been connected, press the details
button in the window with the two buttons (details and
exit). it will show you a load meter and a few
IP-addresses. copy the remote IP-address (called
REMOTEIP below).
then as root, run:
route del default; route add default gw REMOTEIP


to restore to your orignal router:
route del default; route add default gw 192.168.0.1

(192.168.0.1 or whatever router you use).

kb


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 




------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:34:09 -0700
From: Paul deMeurisse <pdemeur comcast net>
Subject: re. Fedora Core 3 Wishlist
To: fedora-list redhat com
Message-ID: <40C39BE1 7070202 comcast net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

How about support for Cisco Aironet 350 wireless adapters?




------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:12:13 -0400
From: Mike Dixon <mdixon10 tampabay rr com>
Subject: burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP
To: fedora-list redhat com
Message-ID: <40C3A4CD 1090603 tampabay rr com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hello all-

new to the wonderful world of Red Hat/Fedora. I'm downloading the ISO 
images from the torrent, and need some help burning the install CDs. 
Last time I tried it, I downloaded each individual iso image (four in 
all) from the Red HAt site, but did something wrong with the burning 
process. Is there a way, through Windows XP, to burn a usable install 
image? Or,am  I better off to download again and use the CD burning 
process described on the Red Hat site?

thanks-

Mike




------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Sun,  6 Jun 2004 19:13:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: howarth bromo msbb uc edu (Jack Howarth)
Subject: top CPU states
To: fedora-list redhat com
Message-ID: <20040606231326 5E8D21DC040 bromo msbb uc edu>

    One thing I noticed on a dual Xeon running Fedora Core 2 compared
to a dual Xeon running RH 3WS is the difference in the output of "top".
Under the Linux 2.4 kernel of RH 3WS I see the individual cpu states
shown as ...

CPU states:  cpu    user    nice  system    irq  softirq  iowait    idle
           total    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%   99.9%
           cpu00    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%  100.0%
           cpu01    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%  100.0%
           cpu02    0.0%    0.0%    0.2%   0.2%     0.0%    0.0%   99.6%
           cpu03    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%  100.0%

whereas under FC2's Linux 2.6 I only see...

Cpu(s):  0.2% us,  0.4% sy,  4.1% ni, 95.3% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,
0.0% si

Just curious why the output has changed from "top".
                Jack




------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:24:28 +0100
From: Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
Subject: Re: top CPU states
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606232428 GA13547 redhat com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 07:13:26PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
 >     One thing I noticed on a dual Xeon running Fedora Core 2 compared
 > to a dual Xeon running RH 3WS is the difference in the output of
"top".
 > Under the Linux 2.4 kernel of RH 3WS I see the individual cpu states
 > shown as ...
 > 
 > CPU states:  cpu    user    nice  system    irq  softirq  iowait
idle
 >            total    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
99.9%
 >            cpu00    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
100.0%
 >            cpu01    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
100.0%
 >            cpu02    0.0%    0.0%    0.2%   0.2%     0.0%    0.0%
99.6%
 >            cpu03    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
100.0%
 > 
 > whereas under FC2's Linux 2.6 I only see...
 > 
 > Cpu(s):  0.2% us,  0.4% sy,  4.1% ni, 95.3% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,
0.0% si
 > 
 > Just curious why the output has changed from "top".

There are (or at least were) two competing upstream procps packages.
For Fedora Core 2, we switched to the one that was more actively
maintained.

		Dave




------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 01:25:55 +0200
From: bit <bit_char_g gmx net>
Subject: Re: burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <200406070122 20072 bit_char_g gmx net>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

Am Montag 07 Juni 2004 01:12 schrieb Mike Dixon:
> Hello all-
>
> new to the wonderful world of Red Hat/Fedora. I'm downloading the ISO
> images from the torrent, and need some help burning the install CDs.
> Last time I tried it, I downloaded each individual iso image (four in
> all) from the Red HAt site, but did something wrong with the burning
> process. Is there a way, through Windows XP, to burn a usable install
> image? Or,am  I better off to download again and use the CD burning
> process described on the Red Hat site?
>
> thanks-
>
> Mike

I dont know what the Red Hat Website suggest regarding the burning of
those 
images, but I would suggest to simply use Nero under Win.
Select "Burn Image File", specify the first image file and u should be
fine.

bit

-- 
MICROSOFT: Where do you want to go today? APPLE: Where do you want to go

tomorrow? LINUX: Are you coming or what?




------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:28:18 -0500
From: Gregory Pittman <gpittman iglou com>
Subject: Re: Mounting Fat 32 (Windows) directory in FC2
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <40C3B6A2 2080003 iglou com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Mac wrote:

>Using the 'defaults' in fstab worked to auto mount the
>drive but now the drive icon doesn't appear on the
>desktop.  With all of your help .. I am getting
>closer.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mac
>
If you're using KDE, right-click on the desktop, select Create New > 
Device > Hard Disc Device.
This brings up a Properties requestor; click on Device tab, then if you 
click on the 'V' to the right of the Device window, you can select from 
the list of possible devices.

Greg




------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 18:29:45 -0500
From: Clif Smith <fedora cjs226 com>
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <40C3A8E9 4090908 cjs226 com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Roll up your sleeves and get to it!  At the very least you could help 
with the documentation.

cjs

Ankit Malik wrote:

>Fedora Core 3 Wishlist
>
>Just keep adding your wishes to it in points if possible
>
>1. Faster KDE
>2. Faster GNOME ( its too slow for me right now)
>3. Support for my ATI Mach 64 GX @ 1024x768 (! That depends more on
>XORG than Fedora Core)
>4. KDE menu Editor to be fixed
>5. Standby to work in my PC 9its not working)
>6. Better and stunning graphics ( like SUSE)
>7. Some software similar to 'Mandrake Control Gallery'  or YaST'
>8. MP3 support  (!!!!! out of the box :or atleast post the link where
>we can get it from : it will be easy for newbies then : www.gurulabs.
>com/ ..........)
>9. Ice WM 
>10. Remove obselete applications as muchba s possible
>11. A fantastic documentation (idiot proof ) to go along with the
distro
>12.  More video playing softwares 'out of the box' 
>13.  Super Karamba"out of the box'
>14. RPM Files Manager :In FC2 its just by command FC1 was better
>15. Plugins for Mozilla etc. preinstalled as in Lycoris
>16. Information for newbies RE filesystem during install so that they
>can choose the best FS in the beginning.
>17. Gdesklets 'out of the box'
>18. Mozilla Firefox 'out of the boz' (!!!!! how many 'out of the box')
>19. KDE Panel can be customized much better
>20. Voice Chat software ( i cant find any right now anywhere)
>21. Support for Microphone (it was there in FC1)
>22.  Better CDROM Device Mounting (its next to broken in FC2 :-(    ) 
>23. UP2DATE Should be gixed :::PLEASE >>>>>>
>
>Phew! that is all ... please post yours ..
>
>
>  
>




------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:31:36 +0100
From: Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606233136 GB13547 redhat com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 02:44:32PM +0100, Paul Duffy wrote:

 > NTFS read capability compiled in by default.

Won't happen anytime soon due to the concerns mentioned elsewhere
in this thread.

 > Make Wine work again dammit.

The problem here is prelinking/address space randomisation.
Wine wants to load Windows libraries and such at absolute addresses
and prelink might have already reloaded stuff there.
If you disable prelink, it'll likely work again.

 > An actual option (ie: one which doesn't break a gazillion
dependencies) to 
 > make a non-preemptable kernel so kmail stops hogging my damn CPU.

It already is non-preemptable. Assuming you meant the opposite, and
want us to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, it's very unlikely to happen.
It's a marginal gain for a handful of uses, but brings a whole world
of pain for a lot of other users.

 > 'Probe all SCSI LUNs' compiled in by default so my 6-in-1 card reader
can read 
 > something other than Sony Memory Stick without a recompile.

Won't happen. Having this as default will break on some devices.
It locks up the SCSI bus of badly designed devices.
If you send the relevant info from dmesg, I'll add it to the list
of devices recognised, and it'll automatically be whitelisted.
Longterm, things may change for these devices so the USB
layer recognises the type of device, and does the necessary magic
automatically.

 > I feel these are mostly minor fixes (like the kernel defaults).

A lot of people don't realise, it's very easy to pick a set of
kernel defaults that make everything work 'out of the box'
for one particular system. Trying to make a kernel that works
out of the box for every possible system we target, is a very
different problem space.  For every reason to enable an option,
there's usually a downside, and a reason not to enable it.
Sometimes it's a question of balance, sometimes there are
hard and fast rules (like 'it breaks vendor x's gizmo')

		Dave




------------------------------

Message: 17
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:35:17 -0500
From: "Steven P. Ulrick" <ulrick2 faith4miracle org>
Subject: Re: KPPP with Fedora Core 2
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <20040606183517 76357bcd ulrick2 faith4miracle org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:14:55 -0700
"Clyde Wilson" <clydew accessbee com> wrote:

> I just installed Fedora Core 2 and I can't get kppp to work.  It
> executes and connects...but then nothing.  I've been using kppp for a
> long time.  Last week I used it with Core 1, so I suspect something
> has changed.  Any help would be appreciated!

Hello, Clyde :)
That sounds EXACTLY like what happened to me.  I never found a permanent
fix, but I will quote in full my response to someone that I helped to
attain a good workaround (so good that I forget that I ever had the
problem :))

=======================================================================

I never found a PERMANENT fix, but this is what I found: in my case, the
DNS (Domain Name Server) addresses were not being written to the
/etc/resolv.conf file like they are supposed to.  What I did, at first,
was this:
1. Connected to the internet using my Fedora Core 1 installation.
2. Copied "/etc/resolv.conf", WHILE I was connected to the Internet to a
location that I could copy and paste it from later.  I had to do it that
way, becuase /etc/resolv.conf is EMPTY when you are not connected to the
Internet.
3. Rebooted into Fedora Core 2
4. Connected to the Internet, using KPPP, then, as root, I copied the
"/etc/resolv.conf" that I had gotten from Fedora Core 1 while I was
CONNECTED to the Internet to "/etc/resolv.conf" in Fedora Core 2.
5. Voila! Problem is fixed!

In other words, I copied /etc/resolv.conf which I had gotten from a
running, Internet connected Fedora Core 1 session, to a running,
Internet connected Fedora Core 2 session, and I was able to do
everything that I could not do before.

After a few days of manually copying my /etc/resolv.conf file from
Fedora Core 1 to Fedora Core 2 EVERY time we connected to the Internet,
I found out that I could set those addresses statically in KPPP (I have
NEVER had to do this before.  It always JUST WORKED :))

Assuming you can get a hold of the DNS addresses of your Internet
Provider, do the following:

kppp | Configure | Accounts | Edit (the problem account) | DNS

1. Domain name: www.eagleinet.net (example)
2. Configuration: Manual
3. DNS IP address: 12.345.678.12 (example, of course :))
4. Because I had two entries in my /etc/resolv.conf file from Fedora
Core 1, I repeated step 3, and put the second address in.
5. You should now have two entries that look like the numbers in step 3
in the box labled: DNS address list

Since I started doing that, everything works perfectly.  In fact, I had
forgotten that I had ever had this problem until I got your email :)

Of course, the question still remains: Why did this problem crop up,
apparently, between Fedora Core 2, Test Release 3 (all updated applied)
and Fedora Core 2?  This is a mystery......

Anyway, if you have any further questions, please let me know.
Thank you for letting me help you on this :)

Steven P. Ulrick




------------------------------

Message: 18
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 18:35:55 -0500
From: Clif Smith <fedora cjs226 com>
Subject: Re: Cisco wireless card not setup correctly when booting core
	2
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Message-ID: <40C3AA5B 40200 cjs226 com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Has anyone been able to get Cisco's LEAP authentication to work with a 
Cisco Aironet 350 and FC1 or 2?

cjs

Scot L. Harris wrote:

>On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 16:55, Stuart Munro wrote:
>  
>
>>thank you for your help,it was most appreciated....
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>No problem, glad it worked.
>
>This is one of those problems that should be added to a FAQ or weekly
>FAQ message.  :)
>
>
>  
>




------------------------------

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 4, Issue 101
*******************************************

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.679 / Virus Database: 441 - Release Date: 5/7/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.679 / Virus Database: 441 - Release Date: 5/7/2004
 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]