[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: FC1 Proxy Servers

Well I was not sure if these two nomenclature names were actually proxy
servers.  Are there relative advantages and disadvantages between the
two other than anti-virus?

Thanks Alexander

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:13 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: FC1 Proxy Servers

Am Di, den 08.06.2004 schrieb Chalonec Roger um 17:05:

> I am looking to implement proxy services on FC1 and I have noted that 
> there may be two.  One called Privoxy and another called Squid.  Does 
> anyone have experience with these or a better proxy server that run on

> FC1?  I am currently using Microsoft ISA as a proxy server on Intel.

> Roger   

Your question is a bit unspecific. Both proxies are working great, while
squid is certainly is known by more people than privoxy. I think privoxy
has a better antiv-virus integration capability, if that counts.


Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.5-1.358 
Serendipity 17:11:09 up 6 days, 17:29, load average: 0.43, 0.60, 0.45 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]