[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Md5sum new kernel



Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am Fr, den 11.06.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 18:35:


$ rpm -K kernel-*
kernel-2.6.6-1.427.i686.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
kernel-sourcecode-2.6.6-1.427.noarch.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK


Reviewing the packages, I wonder why the RPM with the kernel source now
is called "kernel-sourcecode" and no longer "kernel-source". Any special
reason for that (while I think it will not break any dependencies)?


Discussed at fedora-test-list with reason being:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2004-June/msg00014.html

    * From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>
* To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
    * Subject: Re: kernel-source for kernel 2.6.6-1.403
    * Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:43:13 +0200

On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 17:25, Mike Lurk wrote:
> I noticed today (on Arjan's site) that there is no kernel-source but
> there is kernel-sourcecode-2.6.6-1.403. Will that replace the
> kernel-source.

yes; the yum/update "you can't update to a noarch package for
kernel-source" mess gets avoided by renaming the package and making it
obsolete/provide the old name.

----------
dex




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]