IBM Bladecenter and Fedora Core 2
fkroeger at iinet.net.au
fkroeger at iinet.net.au
Fri Jun 18 00:28:14 UTC 2004
Yes - ISO was the standard one from the fc2 site (2.6.5-1.358). It
automatically installed the smp version. I have since updated to 2.6.6-1.438
OK.
Interestingly, there appears to be a difference between the blades.
The new one (as well as fc2 install not being able to see the disks) also
couldn't determine the monitor type, so I selected a generic LCD display.
This was good enough to let me continue to the disk partition where it bombed
out.
Regards... Fred
>
> That is interesting. The FC2 you used was the ISO image from the site? I
> burned the iso image on the 1st and we ran into the aforementioned
> problems. I am not in charge of the Bladecenter either (so much cool
> technology which I don't get to play with). Is there a version with the
> bladecenter (or blades)?
>
> We also ran into something with the APG display with the SMP kernel which
> was fixed around June 3 (no, I can't find the message any more)
>
> Benji
>
> At 10:00 AM 6/17/2004, you wrote:
> >Benji - I installed FC2 without a hitch on an IBM Bladecentre (The blade
> >server is a single CPU, single disk model). I selected the buttons for the
> >monitor & CDROM, powered up the blade & it found the CD & displayed the
> >install messages to the screen. I configured both network interfaces
> >OK. It installed the SMP kernel as well.
> >
> >Pleased with my success I am now trying to duplicate my efforts on our
> >Production Blades. These have 2 CPU's and 2 disks on board. The snag I
> >have hit is that it uses a MegaRAID IDE controller. When I go to
> >partition the disk it displays a message stating that there were no disks
> >found.
> >Regards... Fred Kroeger
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list