opinions on replacing vsftpd with proftpd?

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am So, den 20.06.2004 schrieb Robert P. J. Day um 15:32:

>    ok, two votes for proftpd.  that's a consensus, i guess.  i just did a 
> quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm.  since it 
> installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going to 
> be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to 
> test it yet.  unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and 
> version should be used on FC2.
> 
> rday

I won't recommend using a release candidate (RC1). If you search for an
RPM I can recommend from own experience the package by freshrpms.net

http://tettnang.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=206

It is build for FC2 (Tettnang) and comes with a good and solid default
setup / proftpd.conf.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435 
Serendipity 15:54:54 up 21:42, 8 users, 0.55, 0.53, 0.50 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040620/74ebbc0a/attachment-0001.sig>