[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: opinions on replacing vsftpd with proftpd?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:41 pm, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 09:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > My argument for proftpd or pure-ftpd is their capability to use FTP
> > > with TLS....
> >
> >    ok, two votes for proftpd.  that's a consensus, i guess.  i just did a
> > quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm.  since
> > it installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going
> > to be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to
> > test it yet.  unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and
> > version should be used on FC2.
>
> proftpd has historically had many security problems (probably due to the
> many more features).
>
> ftp is braindead anyway, if you have to use a daeon, use one with the
> least ammount of features possible.
>

I think the kernel.org FTP uses vsftpd

> Rui
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA1ZfE2FHsOWMJBKMRAhbJAKC2ncrm3npvm3CS8tax90KGTUdVXACg7VvM
QiWQFEaCz2UZBzxpJjn19No=
=KniO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]