FC2 to RH9
Satish Balay
balay at fastmail.fm
Thu Jun 24 14:17:01 UTC 2004
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ted Gervais wrote:
> Has anyone thought of going back to RH9? That release had virtually no
> problems and while it was the last supported release it still is/was better
> than the fedora distributions. I am thinking of the problems with the sound,
> scanners, and other hardware devices and applications. I would have thought
> that after FC1 that FC2 would have had all the current concerns fixed and it
> would have been as good as RH9. Turns out, it is many steps behind the last
> RedHat release and makes one wonder about continuing.
>
> Anyway - just wondering if others have had the same thought about going back
> to what was better than the current FC2 release??
FC1 -> FC2 was a major change
2.4 kernel -> 2..6 kernel
OSS sound -> ALSA sound.
If things don't work with FC2 to your satisfaction - stick arround
with FC1. FC1 is an improvement over RHL9 - in your terms.
Satish
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list