[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: more detail in rpm changelogs??



Tom Diehl said:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, William Hooper wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> Robert P. J. Day said:
>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>> just yesterday, cvs web access on an FC1 host here stopped working,
>>> and digging thru the error messages was a note that "cvs -l" wasn't
>>> supported anymore.
>>> 
>>> i just checked the changelog for that new cvs package, and there's no
>>> real detail that explained this. the last changelog entry was
>> 
>> It was an upstream change (and noted in the upstream "NEWS" file).  It
>> was removed in 1.11.7, so it was in the original FC1 package (1.11.5)
>> but not the updated one (1.11.15).
> 
> Sounds like a bug to me.

What does?

> If you file one mabye they will put it back.

Put back an option removed upstream?  Doubt it.

> IMO
>  we should not have to stfw just to see the changes made between
> versions.

Who has to stfw?

[whooper kenny cvs-1.11.17]$ grep [-]l /usr/share/doc/cvs-1.11.17/NEWS
* Attempts to use the global `-l' option, removed from both client and server
[...]

-- 
William Hooper



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]