lame servers resolving
T. Nifty Hat Mitchell
mitch48 at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jun 29 21:20:01 UTC 2004
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Mo, den 28.06.2004 schrieb T. Nifty Hat Mitchell um 22:23:
>
> > How do you filter lame-server messages so you can discover
> > problems with your own domain and toss those that are out
> > of your control?
> >
> > My practice when I had responsibility of a large name space was to not
....
> Your warning is correct and rereading my reply to Olga's question was in
> the sense of your arguments a bit unresponsible. Of course lame server
> notifications have their sense.
You are too harsh on yourself ;-)
The first response should address the big 80% of the issue,
as you did. I am just adding additional thoughts that
would complicate things in an initial reply. It is easy to
build on a good start....
> logfile. A possible setup to do so would be in the named.conf:
>
> logging {
> channel lamers {
> file "/var/log/lamer.log" versions 4 size 1m;
> severity info;
> print-time yes;
> print-category yes;
> print-severity yes;
> };
> category lame-servers {
> lamers;
> };
> };
>
> Such a log can be quickly grepped for notifications caused by own
> errors.
I like this addition. It is what I do naturally when I grep my log
files by hand. -v this and -i that.... quickly there is a good filter.
--
T o m M i t c h e l l
/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list