[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9



This maybe trivial, but try
http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Gulik [mailto:greg gulik org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:27 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9
> 
> 
> 
> Ah, good point, but upon checking:
> 
> Client:
> eth0: VIA VT6102 Rhine-II at 0xe8800000, 00:0c:6e:ec:87:0f, IRQ 10.
> eth0: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x786d advertising 
> 01e1 Link 41e1.
> eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner 
> capability of 41e1.
> 
> Server:
> eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
> 
> I checked both switches and those links are both being indicated as 
> full-duplex.
> 
> 
> Here's another data point.  I used scp to copy the same 11MB 
> file that 
> that took 1.7 seconds.  That's really pointing at an NFS 
> problem rather 
> than a network problem.
> 
> 
> Yang Xiao wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Are you sure they are all running at 100/FULL? Try set both 
> interfaces 
> > to 100/FULL instead of AUTO. Yang
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
> greg @ gulik.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]