Follow up to my Swatch article on Fedoranews.org

[Gavin Henry]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 19:00, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> Gavin Henry wrote:
> > Just visit:
> > http://fedoranews.org/ghenry/swatch
>
> And at the URL, you say its "been submitted to the Fedora Core FC2",
> but you post a link to fedora.us bugzilla. This is a very confusing
> and misleading use of inherently confusing and misleading terminology.
> As of now as far as i know, fedora.us is still a separate entity. And
> even if fedora.us does get merged into the Red Hat sponsored Fedora
> Project in the FC2 release timeline (miracles do happen), at best the
> packages published at fedora.us in the meantime are going to fill Fedora
> Extras, and certaintly not land directly into "Official Fedora Core".
> Perhaps
> its best not to suggest that these rpms are going to find their way into
> the official install media images of Fedora Core, and say Fedora Extras,
> which would be a more accurate lie.

Ok, ok, I will change that statement. :-)

- -- 
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.

http://www.magicfx.co.uk
http://FedoraNEWS.ORG/ghenry
http://www.suretecsystems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAS4h+gNqd7Kng8UoRAvVxAJ43IkUBax6sp58RgaPaOvgIq3chtACgrYnw
CPp4ZsBmVCmVIigfDvLOL+4=
=BLTx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----