RPM i386 vs i686 performance (Michal Zeravik)

Michal Zeravik michalz at olomouc.com
Wed Mar 24 15:26:18 UTC 2004


Rebuilding package from src.rpm is very simple:
1. rpm -i packg.src.rpm
[2. edit /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec]
3. rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec [--clean] 
[--target=athlon e.g.]
4. rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/athlon/packg.rpm
Done.

michalz


Michele Schiavo wrote:

>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:16:27 +0100
>From: Michal Zeravik <michalz at olomouc.com>
>Subject: Re: RPM i386 vs i686 performance
>  
>
>>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>>Message-ID: <406070EB.60909 at olomouc.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>Chris and others,
>>I can't measure window desktop response time,
>>but It seems to be faster than original packages.
>>I'm sorry, I know this is subjective.
>>But graphical desktop seems run faster on my athlon-xp
>>when I've rebuild X and KDE.
>>Also memory consuming is much fewer with rebuilded custom kernel
>>than original (or atrpms) one.
>>System is more fresh I think.
>>But I have no numbers, sorry. Give it a try ...
>>
>>michal
>>    
>>
>
>It's too difficult rebuild X from SRPM ?
>Can you write something ?
>So i'll try
>
>Thank's Michele Schiavo
>
>
>
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040324/10322f05/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list