RPM i386 vs i686 performance (Michal Zeravik)

[Daniel Stonier]

rpmbuild --rebuild [--target=..] packg.src.rpm

will do all of those steps in one hit also.

Cheers,
Daniel.


On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:26:18 +0100, Michal Zeravik <michalz at olomouc.com> 
wrote:

> Rebuilding package from src.rpm is very simple:
> 1. rpm -i packg.src.rpm
> [2. edit /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec]
> 3. rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec [--clean]
> [--target=athlon e.g.]
> 4. rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/athlon/packg.rpm
> Done.
>
> michalz
>
>
> Michele Schiavo wrote:
>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:16:27 +0100
>> From: Michal Zeravik <michalz at olomouc.com>
>> Subject: Re: RPM i386 vs i686 performance
>>
>>
>>> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>>> Message-ID: <406070EB.60909 at olomouc.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> Chris and others,
>>> I can't measure window desktop response time,
>>> but It seems to be faster than original packages.
>>> I'm sorry, I know this is subjective.
>>> But graphical desktop seems run faster on my athlon-xp
>>> when I've rebuild X and KDE.
>>> Also memory consuming is much fewer with rebuilded custom kernel
>>> than original (or atrpms) one.
>>> System is more fresh I think.
>>> But I have no numbers, sorry. Give it a try ...
>>>
>>> michal
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's too difficult rebuild X from SRPM ?
>> Can you write something ?
>> So i'll try
>>
>> Thank's Michele Schiavo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
email:snorri_dj at operamail.com
http://members.optusnet.com.au/stonierd/