Config ADSL

Jeff Vian jvian10 at charter.net
Sun May 2 02:19:39 UTC 2004



fedora-list wrote:

>Hi Alexander (and anyone that has some insight into this problem),
>
>Thanks for your help so far.
>
>The files:
>
>/etc/hosts
>
>and
>
>/etc/resolv.conf
>
>are configured correctly.
>
>The connection still fails, so I have included my routing table for you to see, if it helps:
>
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>165.165.128.1__0.0.0.0________255.255.255.255__UH__0__0__0__ppp0
>192.168.1.0____192.168.1.10___255.255.255.0____UG__0__0__0__eth0
>192.168.1.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.255.0____U___0__0__0__eth0
>169.254.0.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.0.0______U___0__0__0__eth0
>127.0.0.0______0.0.0.0________255.0.0.0________U___0__0__0__lo
>0.0.0.0________192.168.1.254__0.0.0.0__________UG__0__0__0__eth0
>
>(underscores for legibility purposes ;-P )
>
>  
>
You have 2 default gateways assigned, and both are on the local LAN
You must remove the default gateways and allow the DSL connection to set 
that up for you.

look in /etc/sysconfig/network and 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and remove them



>The ADSL's IP is 192.168.1.254, host machine eth0 static IP is 192.168.1.10.
>
>I've also set ppp0 as a trusted device in firewall setup if that changes anything.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Regards,
>
>Stuart
>
>
>On Sat, 01 May 2004 19:52:57 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Am Sa, den 01.05.2004 schrieb fedora-list um 19:17:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi Fedorans.
>>>=20
>>>Hmmm... I need some insight to solve this one.
>>>=20
>>>I've set up a FC1 box to access the web through an ADSL device on a UTP n=
>>>      
>>>
>>etwork (ie not USB config).
>>    
>>
>>>=20
>>>I can ping DHCP-assigned IP 165.165.144.130 say.
>>>I can ping P-t-P addr 165.165.128.1 (gateway?) with mask 255.255.255.255
>>>      
>>>
>>So the device setup and the routes seem to fit.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I can't ping DNS 196.25.1.11 say, Ctrl-C shows packet loss.
>>>      
>>>
>>That has not to say much. ping is not the almighty tool much people take
>>it for.
>>
>>$ ping 196.25.1.11
>>PING 196.25.1.11 (196.25.1.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>=46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D4 Packet filtered
>>=46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D5 Packet filtered
>>
>>You easily see, the filter ICMP.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I can't ping canonical names www.cnn.com say, Ctrl-C doesn't even report =
>>>      
>>>
>>a response.
>>
>>www.cnn.com filters ICMP packages too. So a ping has to show you 100%
>>package loss.
>>
>>=46rom www.mit.edu I get ping replies. So try that target.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I've added all sorts of combinations and permutations with 'route add', a=
>>>      
>>>
>>lack.
>>    
>>
>>>=20
>>>It seems as though the further one moves away from the low level function=
>>>      
>>>
>>ality, the less name resolving etc one 'sees'.
>>    
>>
>>>I've this going before, but can't remember how.
>>>I am aware of the naming issue in the 'Internet Connection Wizard', where=
>>>      
>>>
>>one has to enter 'ppp0' as the provider name.
>>    
>>
>>>Any insight is appreciated.
>>>=20
>>>Regards,
>>>=20
>>>Stu@
>>>      
>>>
>>Check the output of "route", the default route has to point to the ppp
>>device.
>>Check the settings in /etc/resolv.conf to have valid nameserver entries
>>(take the DNS server from your ISP).
>>Check /etc/hosts file to have the line for name resolution for
>>localhost: 127.0.0.1.
>>
>>Alexander
>>
>>
>>--=20
>>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
>>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
>>Sirendipity 19:46:43 up 4 days, 18:35, load average: 0.02, 0.11, 0.09=20
>>[ =CE=93=CE=BD=CF=89=CE=B8=CE=B9 =CF=83'=CE=B1=CF=85=CF=
>>=84=CE=BF=CE=BD - gnothi seauton ]
>>my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>





More information about the fedora-list mailing list