restoring FC1 to *new* partition from tar archive
Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
strange at nsk.no-ip.org
Mon May 10 22:47:56 UTC 2004
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 11:54:47PM -0400, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> Now I'm getting a little confused... I found two relevant items under
> info tar.
> => `--numeric-owner'
> => This option will notify `tar' that it should use numeric user and
> => group IDs when creating a `tar' file, rather than names.
The `--numeric-owner' option allows (ANSI) archives to be written (1)
without user/group name information or such information to be
ignored when extracting. It effectively disables the generation
and/or use of user/group name information. This option forces
extraction (2) using the numeric ids from the archive, ignoring the
1) If used when creating archives, the user/group information stored in
the archive for files will be only numeric
2) If used when extracting, it will use only the numeric information and
disregard the names.
This is useful in certain circumstances, when restoring a backup
from an emergency floppy with different passwd/group files for
example. It is otherwise impossible to extract files with the
right ownerships if the password file in use during the extraction
does not match the one belonging to the filesystem(s) being
extracted. This occurs, for example, if you are restoring your
files after a major crash and had booted from an emergency floppy
with no password file or put your disk into another machine to do
Etc., please refer to the info file. (There's a more informational section
about the option later in the file.)
> Which option isn't even mentioned in man tar. Now here is the part I
> don't understand. If it's supposed to be more reliable when extracting
> to a different system, How would it deal with file belonging to
> user=goodDube has UID=1001 on the source file system when on the
> destination file system UID=1001 is held by user=EvilTwin???
If the option --numeric-owner is used:
- the file ownership is changed to uid 1001, that belongs to EvilTwin
Without the option (and with the information that 1001=goodDube in the
1) if a goodDube user also exists in the destination system, lets say with
- the file ownership is changed to goodDube's, 1010. That's what you
2) if such user doesn't exist:
- the file ownership is changed to uid 1001 (the only usable information),
that belongs to EvilTwin
Why you don't want 1 in your case:
You're creating a full backup. When you restore it, you're going to use it
as is, with the *stored* passwd and group files. *Not* the ones being used
in the system while you extracted the files.
> -> `--same-owner'
> -> When extracting an archive, `tar' will attempt to preserve the
> -> owner specified in the `tar' archive with this option present.
> -> This is the default behavior for the superuser; this option has an
> -> effect only for ordinary users.
> Which option is listed (sparsely) in man tar, and sounds like it will
> try to keep the same owner, based on the user name of owner.
Tar will always do that, when it can. Normal users, though, can't change
owners (in most systems), and really don't want to. Otherwise, the
extracted files would probably be useless to you, as they probably belong
to a different user in the system where the archive was created.
As you're extracting as superuser (so that you *can*, on linux, create
files for different users, and, on all systems, create special files), you
don't need to worry about this option.
<snip (I hope already answered by above)>
> If I wanted to use the --numeric-owner option, do I need to use it
> during both the "tar -c" AND the "tar -x" process, or only during the
Only once. If used when creating, it will have no effect when extracting,
as the information isn't stored.
But you probably want to use on extraction, as the added information to
tar could be usefull in other scenarios.
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.
More information about the fedora-list