Problems getting 2 NICs to work.
Kevin Kimmell
kevin at dynamictrend.com
Tue May 18 13:35:47 UTC 2004
Ah... rc.local... thanks.
Here are the results that you asked to see. I'm still quite curious as
to how this is actually working.
[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
12.168.88.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
204.117.218.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 12.168.88.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# ip route list
12.168.88.0/24 dev eth0 scope link
204.117.218.0/24 dev eth0 scope link
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default via 12.168.88.254 dev eth0
[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# ip address list
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
4: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0e:7f:30:52:53 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 12.168.88.12/24 brd 12.168.88.255 scope global eth0
inet 204.117.218.12/24 brd 204.117.218.255 scope global eth0
5: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0e:7f:30:52:52 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And I couldn't get that last command to run. I tried ifcfg-ethX and
ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth01 but all commands were not found. Perhaps
they're not in the path?
++ Kevin Kimmell + kevin_AT_dynamictrend.com + Dynamic Trend, Inc. ++
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>Am Di, den 18.05.2004 schrieb Kevin Kimmell um 00:12:
>
>
>
>>Where should I be placing the default route statement so it survives reboot?
>>
>>
>
>Delete all GATEWAY settings in
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and use instead
>/etc/sysconfig/network with GATEWAY for the default gateway and
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX for the net specific routes. I
>pointed you already to
>
>http://www.akadia.com/services/redhat_static_routes.html
>
>Did that not help?
>
>
>
>>Also, how is it that this is working since you didn't think it could?
>>
>>
>
>Could you post:
>a) route -n
>b) ip route list
>c) ip addr list
>d) ifcfg-ethX
>
>
>
>>Did I leave out that the two ISPs live on the same switch plane on my
>>publis network? That should allow for separate net segments over the
>>same card since neither one has a gateway.
>>
>>I checked it from traces and pings at an external source and it's working...
>>
>>Thanks and WTF???????
>>
>>
>
>Can't say.
>
>Alexander
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040518/97d6a4d3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list