Thoughts and Questions On Yum, Up2Date. Etc.
William Hooper
whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Thu May 20 19:28:54 UTC 2004
billg said:
>> This has been discussed many, many, many, many, many, many times here.
>> Please search the archives.
>
> I know. But the mirrors are still slow.
>
> My point is this: Fedora would be a better product if the confusion about
> up2date and yum and source lists was eliminated.
Feodra would be a better product if it has no bugs that required updates.
Just saying that doesn't help anything.
> Users should be offered
> a choice of updating installed software or adding new software from
> official repositories.
And what part of that doesn't up2date do?
> Unless you're an admin, there should never be a
> need to even know source lists exist.
You don't.
> Something is wrong when an average
> user asks a question about updating and is referred to a tutorial on
> editing mirror lists.
That's why up2date has code to pick a random mirror.
> Microsoft doesn't make users do this;
Who cares? Microsoft doesn't offer a full featured web server, does that
mean we should rip out httpd? If your main arguement is "This isn't how
Microsoft would do things" you have already lost.
> neither
> should RedHat.
Last time I checked, this was a Fedora list, not a Red Hat list.
--
William Hooper
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list