cryptplug from fedora.us for FC2?

Alexander Dalloz alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Mon May 24 14:13:28 UTC 2004


Am Mo, den 24.05.2004 schrieb Roland Wolters um 01:12:

> You are right, sure, I've read it, but you can found something similar at 
> freshrpms.net, and dag has a similar philosophie, too, I think.
> I was confused cause some people talk about fedora.us as a third party repo, 
> and some people talk about as a extra, but official repo.

http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraUsersFAQ

That should answer your questions. Not that hard to find ;)

> And whats about the fereshrpms, dag, and so on? In some forums there are some 
> discussions about the incompatibilitys of some packages from some repos (for 
> example: many people report that freshrpm packages are not compatible with 
> the packages of fedora.us/livna). So who made the failure there?

That is certainly a terrain where the combatants get quickly in hot
temper. I intend to keep out of such fights. But it is a fact, that
mixing some repositories can cause you "conflicts" (yes Michael, I have
your reply to my posting in mind). The question on which side there is a
failure may be better handed to the repository maintainers.

> Confused, Roland

not lucky with the current situation either, Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 16:04:00 up 1 day, 22:00, load average: 1.45, 1.45, 1.33 
                   [ Γνωθι σ'αυτον - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040524/7a77aff9/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list