feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]
Rui Miguel Seabra
rms at 1407.org
Tue May 25 23:30:18 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 16:18 -0700, Frank Tanner III wrote:
> When proprietary drivers are all that's available you
> use them. Whether or not you like it.
Not really. I didn't want to use NVIDIA's proprietary driver so I
didn't.
> It's philosophies like yours that make it so hard for
> any of the "proprietary" companies
No. It's people looking only into their belly buttons...
> Because the "zealots" will rip them apart for even
> trying. They dont HAVE to release a video driver for
> their card in ANY format.
Of course they don't have to. I'd be perfectly happy if they released
enough info for driver developers to make one.
> They released it because
> they wanted to sell more video cards, and they saw
> that Linux was a market share that they wanted.
> Getting a proprietary "black box" driver is better
> than getting no driver at all.
Getting MACROVISION and unstable boxes is so good, yummy... NOT!
> Believe it or not, companies do deserve to make money
> off of their products.
No. What you're saying makes absolutely no sense.
They deserve to *try* to make money. There is no reason for you to get
money just because you did something. It has to be worth it for someone.
> So what if their driver
> contains "black box" proprietary code. They're not
> charging you for the driver. Linux is about "free as
> in speech" not "free as in beer".
What "free speech" does the driver bring? It EVEN restricts free speech
with it's imposed MACROVISION. You don't even know what you're talking
about.
> Do you think Oracle
> releases an Open Source version of their high-end
> databases? Hell no. It's all "black box".
I don't care about Oracle. There's PostgreSQL.
Rui
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/a6c052fd/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list