Fedora Core 2 on schedule?

[Luc Bouchard]

On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 17:30, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Not applicable to several thousand other people who *plan* around that 
> schedule, Tom. Also, given the size of this audience, the more 
> professionally things are done, the better things will go and the more 
> smoothly the community will function. Personally, I believe that if one 
> posts a schedule one should:
> 
>          1. Only post milestone points which can be clearly defined and are 
> important.
> 
>          2. Clearly note the date when each milestone is passed (and post 
> this information, of course).
> 
>          3. Post *one paragraph* of "latest news" and update it once a week 
> or whenever a milestone is passed... whichever is more frequent.
> 
>          4. Immediately post any changes to the posted schedule.
> 
> Even if one poor sod is doing all the website maintenance, the above four 
> points would not take him/her any longer than five minutes a week. And 
> given the positive PR and impact on the perception of the afore-mentioned 
> several thousand people plus magazine reviewers, other press contacts, 
> idiots who say we'll never be a polished, business-usable operating system, 
> et al., I should think that those four points are the *very least* the 
> Fedora Project should complete re the posted schedule.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz at simpaticus.com
> http://www.simpaticus.com
> 

I'd even volunteer to be the poor sod that updates the site if that is
what it takes to make sure we have timely information.

Luc Bouchard